Executive Summary: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | LangChain | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | General LLM application framework | RAG and data retrieval specialized |
| Best Use Case | Agent workflows, complex chains | Document Q&A, knowledge retrieval |
| Learning Curve | Moderate (more concepts to learn) | Easier (focused on RAG) |
| Data Connectors | 50+ integrations | 100+ specialized connectors |
| RAG Performance | Good (requires more setup) | Excellent (optimized out-of-box) |
| Agent Support | Excellent (built-in ReAct, Plan-Execute) | Basic (can integrate with LangChain) |
| Community Size | Larger (60K+ GitHub stars) | Growing (25K+ GitHub stars) |
| Documentation | Extensive but can be overwhelming | Clear, focused on RAG patterns |
| Enterprise Features | LangSmith for observability | LlamaCloud for managed services |
| Pricing | Open source + LangSmith ($39-$199/mo) | Open source + LlamaCloud (usage-based) |
What is LangChain?
LangChain is a comprehensive framework for building LLM-powered applications. It provides building blocks for chains (sequences of LLM calls), agents (autonomous decision-making), memory (conversation context), and tool integration.
🔗 LangChain Strengths
- Chain Composition: Build complex workflows with sequential, parallel, or conditional logic
- Agent Framework: Create AI agents that can use tools, make decisions, and execute multi-step plans
- Memory Systems: Conversation buffers, entity memory, knowledge graphs
- Tool Integration: Connect to APIs, databases, search engines, calculators
- Wide Adoption: Large community, extensive documentation, many examples
- LangSmith: Production observability platform for debugging and monitoring
When to Choose LangChain:
- Building agent-based systems that need to use multiple tools
- Complex workflows with conditional logic
- Need extensive integrations beyond just RAG
- Want flexibility to customize every component
- Team has time to learn the framework deeply
What is LlamaIndex?
LlamaIndex (formerly GPT Index) is a data framework specifically designed for RAG applications. It focuses on ingesting, structuring, and retrieving data for LLMs with maximum accuracy and efficiency.
🦙 LlamaIndex Strengths
- RAG-Optimized: Built specifically for retrieval use cases with best practices baked in
- Data Connectors: 100+ connectors for PDFs, APIs, databases, cloud storage
- Smart Indexing: Multiple index types (vector, tree, keyword, graph) for different use cases
- Query Engine: Advanced retrieval with reranking, filtering, and fusion
- Easier RAG Setup: Less boilerplate for common RAG patterns
- LlamaCloud: Managed parsing and indexing service
When to Choose LlamaIndex:
- Primary use case is document Q&A or knowledge retrieval
- Need to ingest many different data formats
- Want optimized RAG performance out-of-the-box
- Prefer focused, RAG-specific abstractions
- Faster time-to-production for RAG use cases
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
1. Data Ingestion & Connectors
LangChain: Provides document loaders for common formats (PDF, CSV, HTML, etc.). Requires more manual configuration for complex sources.
LlamaIndex: 100+ specialized connectors including Notion, Google Drive, Slack, databases, and APIs. More plug-and-play experience.
Winner: LlamaIndex for breadth and ease of use.
2. Chunking & Text Splitting
LangChain: Multiple text splitters (recursive, character, token-based). Good flexibility but requires tuning.
LlamaIndex: Intelligent node parsers that understand document structure. Semantic chunking and sentence window retrieval.
Winner: LlamaIndex for smarter default chunking strategies.
3. Vector Storage & Indexing
LangChain: Integrates with major vector databases. Standard vector store interface.
LlamaIndex: Multiple index types beyond vectors (tree index, keyword index, knowledge graph). More sophisticated retrieval options.
Winner: LlamaIndex for index variety and retrieval sophistication.
4. Retrieval Quality
LangChain: Basic similarity search. Need to implement reranking and filtering manually.
LlamaIndex: Built-in reranking, metadata filtering, hybrid search, and query fusion. Better retrieval accuracy out-of-the-box.
Winner: LlamaIndex for retrieval quality and ease of optimization.
5. Agent Capabilities
LangChain: Comprehensive agent framework with ReAct, Plan-Execute, and custom agent types. Can use tools and make multi-step decisions.
LlamaIndex: Basic agent support. Can create query engines as tools but less sophisticated than LangChain.
Winner: LangChain for agent-based workflows.
6. Chain Composition
LangChain: Flexible chain building with LCEL (LangChain Expression Language). Sequential, parallel, and conditional chains.
LlamaIndex: Query pipelines for RAG workflows. Less flexible than LangChain for non-RAG use cases.
Winner: LangChain for complex workflow orchestration.
7. Memory & Context Management
LangChain: Multiple memory types (buffer, summary, entity, knowledge graph). Sophisticated conversation management.
LlamaIndex: Chat memory for conversational retrieval. Simpler but sufficient for most RAG use cases.
Winner: LangChain for advanced memory requirements.
8. Observability & Debugging
LangChain: LangSmith provides excellent tracing, debugging, and evaluation tools. Production-grade observability.
LlamaIndex: Built-in callbacks and logging. LlamaCloud offers managed observability.
Winner: Tie - both have strong observability options.
Use Case Recommendations
Choose LangChain For:
- Customer Support Automation: Needs agents that can search docs, check order status, create tickets
- Research Assistants: Multi-step reasoning, web search, and synthesis
- Workflow Automation: Complex business processes with conditional logic
- Multi-Tool Systems: Chatbots that need to call APIs, run code, search databases
Choose LlamaIndex For:
- Internal Knowledge Bases: Search across company docs, wikis, and databases
- Compliance Q&A: Regulatory documents, policies, procedures
- Document Analysis: Contract review, due diligence, research papers
- Technical Documentation: API docs, code repositories, technical manuals
Use Both Together For:
- Enterprise RAG with Agents: LlamaIndex handles retrieval, LangChain orchestrates agent workflows
- Multi-Source Systems: LlamaIndex for document retrieval + LangChain for API calls and tool use
- Complex Pipelines: LlamaIndex query engines as tools within LangChain agents
Performance Considerations
RAG Quality
For pure RAG use cases, LlamaIndex typically delivers better out-of-the-box results:
- Retrieval Precision: LlamaIndex's reranking and filtering improve relevance
- Context Utilization: Better at fitting relevant information in context windows
- Citation Accuracy: Stronger source tracking through the pipeline
Flexibility vs Simplicity
LangChain: More flexible but requires more code for basic RAG. Better when you need customization.
LlamaIndex: Simpler for standard RAG patterns. Less code for common use cases.
Production Readiness
Both frameworks are production-ready with proper implementation:
- LangChain: Proven at scale with LangSmith for monitoring
- LlamaIndex: Used in production by major enterprises with LlamaCloud support
Enterprise Considerations
Observability
LangChain + LangSmith: Comprehensive tracing, debugging, and evaluation platform. See every step of chain execution.
LlamaIndex + LlamaCloud: Managed parsing and indexing with built-in observability. Good for teams that want less infrastructure management.
Evaluation & Testing
Both frameworks support evaluation:
- LangChain: LangSmith evaluations, custom evaluators, benchmark datasets
- LlamaIndex: Built-in evaluation modules for retrieval quality, response relevance, faithfulness
Access Control & Security
Both require custom implementation for enterprise security:
- Document-level access controls
- User authentication and authorization
- Audit logging
- Data encryption
Neither framework provides these out-of-the-box - they must be built into your application layer.
Community & Ecosystem
LangChain
- GitHub Stars: 60K+ (as of Dec 2025)
- Community: Very active Discord, frequent updates
- Integrations: 100+ tool integrations, extensive partner ecosystem
- Learning Resources: Abundant tutorials, courses, blog posts
LlamaIndex
- GitHub Stars: 25K+ (as of Dec 2025)
- Community: Active Discord, responsive maintainers
- Integrations: 100+ data connectors, growing tool ecosystem
- Learning Resources: Excellent documentation, focused tutorials
Migration & Interoperability
Can You Switch Between Them?
Yes, but with effort. The core concepts (embeddings, vector search, prompting) are similar, but the APIs differ significantly.
Using Them Together
Many production systems use both:
- LlamaIndex creates the retrieval engine
- Wrap it as a LangChain tool
- Use LangChain agents to orchestrate retrieval + other actions
Example Architecture:
- LlamaIndex: Handles document ingestion and semantic search
- LangChain: Orchestrates agent that can search docs (via LlamaIndex), call APIs, and execute workflows
Our Recommendation Matrix
| Your Situation | Recommended Framework | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Simple document Q&A | LlamaIndex | Faster implementation, better RAG defaults |
| Customer support with actions | LangChain | Need agents to create tickets, check status |
| Internal knowledge base | LlamaIndex | Focus on retrieval quality and data connectors |
| Research assistant | LangChain | Multi-step reasoning and web search integration |
| Compliance/regulatory Q&A | LlamaIndex | Citation accuracy and retrieval precision critical |
| Complex enterprise workflow | Both (LlamaIndex + LangChain) | Use each for their strengths |
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Can I use LangChain and LlamaIndex together?
A: Yes! This is common in production. Use LlamaIndex for retrieval (it's better at RAG) and LangChain for agent orchestration. LlamaIndex query engines can be wrapped as LangChain tools.
Q: Which framework is faster to learn?
A: LlamaIndex has a gentler learning curve for RAG-specific use cases. LangChain has more concepts to learn but offers greater flexibility once mastered.
Q: Do I need both frameworks for enterprise RAG?
A: No. Either framework can handle enterprise RAG. Choose based on your specific requirements (pure RAG → LlamaIndex; agents + RAG → LangChain or both).
Q: Which has better documentation?
A: LlamaIndex documentation is more focused and easier to navigate for RAG use cases. LangChain documentation is more comprehensive but can be overwhelming for beginners.
Q: What about cost differences?
A: Both are open source and free. Costs come from: (1) LLM API calls (same for both), (2) Vector database (same for both), (3) Optional managed services (LangSmith vs LlamaCloud - similar pricing).
Q: Can I migrate from one to the other?
A: Yes, but requires rewriting application code. The underlying concepts (embeddings, vector search) are the same, but the APIs differ. Budget 2-4 weeks for migration depending on complexity.
Q: Which framework is more actively maintained?
A: Both are actively maintained with frequent updates. LangChain has more contributors; LlamaIndex has faster response to issues. Both are backed by well-funded companies.
Q: What about vendor lock-in?
A: Both are open source, so no lock-in at the framework level. Optional managed services (LangSmith, LlamaCloud) can be avoided by self-hosting observability tools.
Real-World Implementation Examples
Scenario 1: Healthcare Knowledge Base (LlamaIndex)
Requirements: Search across 5,000+ clinical protocols and medical literature
Why LlamaIndex:
- Excellent PDF parsing for medical documents
- Metadata filtering by department, date, document type
- High retrieval precision needed for medical accuracy
- Citation tracking for compliance
Scenario 2: Customer Support Agent (LangChain)
Requirements: Answer questions AND create support tickets, check order status
Why LangChain:
- Needs agent to decide: search docs vs call API vs escalate to human
- Tool integration with CRM and ticketing system
- Multi-step workflows (search → analyze → act)
- Conversation memory for context across turns
Scenario 3: Enterprise Knowledge + Workflow (Both)
Requirements: Search internal docs AND execute business processes
Why Both:
- LlamaIndex: Handles document retrieval from Confluence, SharePoint, Slack
- LangChain: Orchestrates agent that searches (via LlamaIndex) + calls APIs + executes workflows
- Best of both worlds: Optimized retrieval + flexible agents
Conclusion: Which Should You Choose?
🎯 Decision Framework
Start with LlamaIndex if:
- Your primary goal is accurate document retrieval and Q&A
- You want faster time-to-production for RAG
- You have many different data sources to connect
- You prefer focused, RAG-specific abstractions
Start with LangChain if:
- You need agent capabilities and tool integration
- Your use case extends beyond pure RAG
- You want maximum flexibility and customization
- You're building complex, multi-step workflows
Use both if:
- You need best-in-class retrieval AND agent capabilities
- You're building a comprehensive enterprise AI platform
- You have the engineering resources to manage both
Our Experience: At Predictive Tech Labs, we use both frameworks depending on client requirements. For pure RAG use cases (70% of projects), we prefer LlamaIndex for faster implementation and better retrieval quality. For agent-based systems (30% of projects), we use LangChain or a hybrid approach.
Need Help Choosing the Right Framework?
We have deep expertise in both LangChain and LlamaIndex. Let us help you choose and implement the best solution for your use case.
Schedule a Consultation